Baby

Busted! Too Much Sugar & Salt! The Baby Food Health Claims Failing Global Standards!

22 Shares

When I had babies and started feeding them solid baby food, I was fortunate to have a mum who would make their food fresh. She’d put so many different veggies in their food, then adding ground meat once they were more advanced and could chew better.

The only time I’d buy commercial food was if I wanted to treat them to a dessert option, were in the hospital dealing with my oldest who was recovering from Citrobacter, or if I was craving some banana or chocolate custard (because they were the best flavours). Admittedly, I didn’t put a lot of thought into how healthy the food was at the time. But also, back then there weren’t as many claims about how great the food was.

Not everyone can or wants to make their baby’s food themselves, and for a lot of parents, the jars of food they buy in the baby aisle or the small freezer meals are a solution.

But do you know what’s really in your baby’s food?

Eye-opening Study Reveals The Truth

Misleading Labels

Even though buying commercial food is a convenient choice, you’d think baby food with labels like “organic” or “no added sugar” would be good for your bub, right? Wrong. Turns out, that’s not always the case.

A recent study by The George Institute for Global Health found that over 75% of baby foods on Aussie shelves don’t meet basic nutritional standards. The problem? Too much sugar, and a whole lot of sneaky marketing.

These so-called “healthy” products often fail to deliver what they promise.

The labels might look trustworthy, but the truth is, they are mostly just marketing tactics.

Dr. Elizabeth Dunford, the lead author of the study, pointed out:

“Parents are being misled by these claims. They trust the labels to be accurate, but the reality is that many of these products are far from healthy. It’s disappointing to see companies prioritising their profits over the wellbeing of our children.”

The Hidden Dangers in Baby Food

If you’re buying baby food in pouches, you might want to check the sugar content. These pouches, which are super popular with Aussie parents, are often loaded with more sugar than you’d expect. This study revealed that only half of these pouches met the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) sugar guidelines. That’s a lot of hidden sweetness where you least expect it.

This high sugar content can set kids up for a lifetime of poor eating habits. It’s not just about giving them a treat; it’s about their health in the long run. Dietician Dr Daisy Coyle warns, “Introducing babies to high-sugar foods at such an early stage can shape their taste preferences, leading to a stronger craving for sugary and salty foods later in life. This isn’t just about immediate satisfaction—this could be setting the stage for obesity, diabetes, and other serious health issues down the road.”

It’s not just about giving them a treat; it’s about their health in the long run.

WHO Standards …  What Standards?

None of the products studied met the standards for prohibited claims set out by the World Health Organisation (WHO). This includes statements about sugar content, whether they are organic, or whether they do not contain artificial colours and flavours.

That means all those labels boasting about being organic or free from additives are pretty much meaningless.

“Time-poor parents are looking for convenience, but most would be shocked by industry’s deceptive marketing tactics suggesting products are healthier than they are, that are rife across this category,” she said. “They would probably also be surprised to know that regulatory safeguards to protect children from exposure to unhealthy food marketing are currently very limited.” Dr Dunford

These products aren’t living up to the health standards you’d expect for your baby, and that’s a big worry.

Take a listen to them discuss it on  SBS News here.

The lack of regulation means that companies can make all sorts of claims without facing any real consequences. This leaves parents in a tough spot, trying to navigate a market full of misleading information.

Profit Over Nutrition

It’s clear too many baby food companies seem more focused on profits than on providing healthy options. These brands often load their products with excess sugar and salt, while proudly boasting about “organic” or “natural” ingredients on the packaging.

The real motivation?

Turning a profit rather than ensuring your baby’s health. The result is a range of products that are more about flashy marketing than actual nutrition. As Dr Daisy Coyle puts it,

“The food industry is prioritising their bottom line over the health of our children. The labels might look appealing, but they often mask the unhealthy reality inside.”

Parents need to be aware that these companies are more interested in sales than in providing genuinely healthy food options.


It’s a minefield for parents trying to navigate feeding their little ones with all the flashy labels and supposed health claims. We want to do the best we can by providing them with a healthy start to life, and we should be able to trust these companies to put our kids’ health first. Right?

The need for stricter regulations to ensure that baby foods meet health standards is evident. Until then, it’s up to us to be vigilant and advocate for better transparency.

What to read next 

22 Shares
Avatar of Tina Evans

Tina Evans is a complete introvert, an avid reader of romance novels, horror novels and psychological thrillers. She’s a writer, movie viewer, and manager of the house menagerie: three kelpies, one cat, a fish, and a snake. She loves baking and cooking and using her kids as guinea pigs. She was a teenage parent and has learned a lot in twenty-three years of parenting. Tina loves Christmas and would love to experience a white Christmas once in her life. Aside from writing romance novels, she is passionate about feminism, equality, sci-fi, action movies and doing her part to help the planet.

Write A Comment

Share via
Copy link